EFFECTS OF DMARD TREATMENT ON SARS-CoV-2 mRNA VACCINATION IN PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC AUTOIMMUNE RHEUMATIC DISEASE: A MATCHED, PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

BackgroundPatients suffering from systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD) display poor antibody development after two doses of mRNA vaccinations leaving these patients with only limited humoral protection against severe SARS-CoV-2 disease courses. Of key interest is the effect of conventional synthetic (csDMARD) and biological/ targeted drugs (b/tsDMARDs) disease modifying antirheumatic drugs on the time of protection.ObjectivesTo compare antibody titer development in patients with vasculitis and connective tissue disease (CTD) with healthy controls 6 months after two mRNA vaccinations and after third immunization. To analyze factors, that affect the velocity of titer decline, well as qualitative humoral response.MethodsPatients with SARD were enrolled and matched for gender and age with healthy control subjects (HC) and the humoral response after 6 months to two doses of mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 in terms of SARS-COV-2 antibody titer was assessed. In addition to binding antibody units (BAU) we also analyzed neutralizing antibodies. Patients receiving B-cell depleting therapy and those with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection (via detection of nucleocapsid antibodies) were excluded. Differences between two groups were calculated with Wilcoxon signed-rank test.ResultsA total of 53 patients with SARD (42 patients suffering from connective tissue disease and 11 with vasculitis respectively) and 73 HC were analysed. Interestingly only patients receiving a combination therapy of different csDMARDs/ b/tsDMARDs demonstrated diminished antibody titers 6 months after two doses of mRNA vaccine (p-value p-value<0,001), whereas patients receiving only csDMARD as monotherapy displayed comparable antibody levels to healthy controls. This effect was equalized after a third booster vaccination (p-value=0,13). Concerning disease entities, patients with vasculitis seemed to have lower BAU than HC (p-value<0,05) and patients suffering from CTD. After third vaccination both patient groups had lower antibody levels than HC (vasculitis: p-value <0,0001;CTD: p-value p-value<0,01). Lower antibody levels before third vaccination correlated with lower antibodies after third immunization.ConclusionPatients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases undergoing combination therapy may be more vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection, due to reduced antibody levels 6 months following two doses of mRNA vaccine. Our data strongly recommends antibody measurements in patients receiving combination therapy and individualized earlier booster vaccination.Figure 1.Anti-SARS-Cov-2 S antibody titers. A: Antibody titers measured 6 months after two doses of mRNA vaccination in patients with connective tissue disease, vasculitis and healthy controls. B, Antibody levels according to disease entity. AB: antibody;BAU: binding antibody unit;CTD: connective tissue disease;HC: healthy control;mono: disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug monotherapy;combination: combination therapy of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs;RBD: receptor binding domain;[Figure omitted. See PDF]Table 1.Demographic parameters and therapy of study participants.SARD (n=53)HC (n=73)Age, mean (standard deviation)53.55 (±14.04)51.27 (±14.07)Female45 (84.9%)47 (64.4%)Connective tissue disease42 (79%)Vasculitis11 (21%)csDMARD or b/tsDMARD monotherapy22 (41%)csDMARD and/or b/tsDMARD combination therapy13 (25%)No therapy18 (34%)Methotrexate8 (15%)Mycophenolate mofetil10 (19%)Hydroxychloroquine17 (32%)Azathioprine8 (15%)Belimumab3 (6%)Tocilizumab3 (6%)Glucocorticoid dose 1. vaccination, mean (standard deviation)2.8 (±10.8)Glucocorticoid dose 2. vaccination, mean (standard deviation)2.6 (±10.7)SARD: Systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease, HC: Healthy controls, csDMARD: conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs and b/tsDMARD: biological/ targeted drugs disease modifying antirheumatic drugsREFERENCES:NIL.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsElisabeth Simader Speakers bureau: Lilly, Thomas Deimel: None declared, Felix Kartnig: None declared, Selma Tobudic: None declared, Helmuth Hasla her Grant/research support from: Glock Health, BlueSky Immunotherapies and Neutrolis, Thomas Maria Karonitsch: None declared, Daniel Mrak: None declared, Thomas Nothnagl: None declared, Thomas Perkmann: None declared, Helga Lechner-Radner: None declared, Judith Sautner: None declared, Florian Winkler: None declared, Heinz Burgmann Speakers bureau: speaker fees from Shionogi, Pfizer, MSD, Paid instructor for: advisory boards for Valneva, MSD, Gilead, Consultant of: consulting fees from MSD, Pfizer, Takeda, Gilead, Daniel Aletaha Speakers bureau: other from Abbvie, Amgen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Grant/research support from: grants from Abbvie, Amgen, Lilly, Novartis, Roche, SoBi, Sanofi, Stefan Winkler: None declared, Stephan Blüml Speakers bureau: personal fees from Abbvie, personal fees from Novartis, Peter Mandl Speakers bureau: reports speaker fees from AbbVie, Janssen and Novartis, Grant/research support from: research grants from AbbVie, BMS, Novartis, Janssen, MSD and UCB.

IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON ADHERENCE TO DISEASE MODIFYING DRUGS AMONG PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATIC DISEASES: A POPULATION-BASED, INTERRUPTED TIME SERIES ANALYSIS

BackgroundAlthough studies have quantified adherence to medications among patients with rheumatic diseases (RD) during the COVID-19, lack of direct pre-pandemic comparison precludes understanding of impact of the pandemic.ObjectivesOur objective was to evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on adherence to disease modifying drugs (DMARDs) including conventional synthetic (csDMARDs) and targeted synthetic (tsDMARDs).MethodsWe linked population-based health data on all physician visits, hospital admissions, and all dispensed medications, regardless of payer in British Columbia from 01/01/1996 to 3/31/2021. We identified prescriptions for csDMARDs (including methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine) and tsDMARDs, namely anti-TNFs (including infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab) and rituximab using drug identification numbers among indicated individuals with RD. We defined March 11, 2020, as the ‘index date' which corresponded to the date that mitigation measures for the COVID-19 pandemic were first introduced. We assessed adherence as proportion days covered (PDC), calculated monthly in the 12 months before and 12 months after the index date. We used interrupted time-series models, namely segmented regression to estimate changes and trends in adherence before and after the index date.ResultsOur analysis showed that the mean PDCs for all included DMARDs stayed relatively steady in the 12 months before and after mitigation measures were introduced (see Table 1). Adherence was highest among anti-TNFs, methotrexate, and azathioprine. Anti-TNFs were on a downward trajectory 12 months prior to the index date. Interrupted time-series modeling demonstrated statistically significant differences in the trends in PDCs post- vs. pre-mitigation measures for all anti-TNFS (slope [∂]: 1.38, standard error [SE]: 0.23), infliximab (∂: 1.35, SE: 0.23), adalimumab (∂: 0.82, SE: 0.25), and etanercept (∂: 1.07, SE: 0.25) (see Figure 1a). Conversely, the csDMARDs were on a flatter trajectory, and methotrexate (∂: -0.53, SE: 0.16), leflunomide (∂: 0.43, SE: 0.08), mycophenolate (∂: -1.26, SE: 0.48), cyclophosphamide (∂: 0.29, SE: 0.05), minocycline (∂: 0.04, SE: 0.02), chloroquine (∂: 0.02, SE: 0.00) showed statistically significant changes in estimated PDC trajectory after mitigation measures were introduced (see Figure 1b).ConclusionThis population-based study demonstrates that messaging and pandemic mitigation measures did not affect adherence to DMARDs.Table 1.Mean PDC 1 year before and after mitigation measures for the COVID-19 pandemic were introduced.MedicationMean PDC (%) 12 months before index dateMean PDC (%) 12 months after index datecsDMARDsmethotrexate28.926.8azathioprine21.819.5sulfasalazine16.214.9leflunomide14.313.0cyclosporine13.711.5hydroxychloroquine10.59.6mycophenolate4.52.9antimalarials4.43.9penicillamine3.53.4cyclophosphamide1.50.7chlorambucil1.20.4minocycline1.10.9gold0.50.2chloroquine0.10.0tsDMARDsanti-TNFs52.149.2infliximab41.838.3adalimumab40.336.8etanercept31.828.9rituximab3.42.9REFERENCES:NIL.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

HUMORAL AND CELLULAR IMMUNOGENICITY INDUCED BY THIRD BOOSTER OF SARS-CoV-2 VACCINES IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATIC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES

BackgroundAmid the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis, two messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have benefited most people worldwide. While healthy people can acquire sufficient humoral immunity against COVID-19 even in the elderly by vaccination with three doses of vaccine., recent studies have shown that complex factors other than age, including the type of vaccines and immunosuppressive drugs, are associated with immunogenicity in patients with rheumatic musculoskeletal disease (RMD). Identifying factors that contribute to the vulnerability of those patients to acquire not only humoral but also cellular immunity to SARS-CoV-2 despite multiple vaccinations is crucial for establishing an appropriate booster vaccine strategy.ObjectivesTo assess humoral,and T cell immune responses after third doses of mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2.MethodsThis prospective observational study included consecutive RMD patients treated with immunosuppressant who received three doses of mRNA vaccines including BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273. Blood samples were obtained 2-6 weeks after second and third dose of mRNA vaccines. We measured neutralizing antibody titres, which against the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 and seroconversion rates to evaluate the humoral responses. We also assessed T-cell immunity responses using interferon releasing assay against SARS-CoV-2.ResultsA total of 586 patients with RMD treated with mmunosuppressive treatments were enrolled. The mean age was 54 years, and 70% of the patients were female. Seroconversion rates and neutralizing antibody titres after third vaccination of SARS-CoV-2 were significantly higher compared to those after second vaccination (seroconversion rate, 94.5% vs 83.6%, p<0.001;titres of neutralizing antibody, 48.2 IU/mL vs 11.0 IU/mL, p<0.001, respectively). Interferon releasing assay after third vaccinations demonstrated that T cell reaction against SARS-CoV-2 was also increased from that of second vaccination (interferon for antigen 1, 1.11.9 vs 0.61.9, p=0.004,interferon for antigen 2, 1.72.6 vs 0.82.3, p=0.004). Humoral and cellular immunogenicity did not differ between the types of third vaccination including full dose of BNT162 and half dose of mRNA1273.(neutralizing antibody titers, 47.8±76.1 IU/mL vs 49.0±60.1 IU/mL, p<0.001;interferon for antigen 1, 1.12.0 vs 1.01.5, p=0.004, respectively). Attenuated humoral response to third vaccination was associated with BNT162b2 as second vaccination age (>60 years old), glucocorticoid (equivalent to prednisolone > 7.5 mg/day), and immunosuppressant use including mycophenolate, and rituximab. On another front, use of mycophenolate and abatacept or tacrolimus but not rituximab were identified as negative factors for T-cell reactions against SARS-CoV-2. Although 53 patients (9.0%) who had been immunised with third-vaccination contracted COVID-19 during Omicron pandemic phase, no one developed severe pulmonary disease that required corticosteroid therapy.ConclusionOur results demonstrated third mRNA vaccination booster of SARS-CoV-2 contributed to restore both humeral and cellular immunity in RMD patients with immunosuppressants. We also identified that certain immunosuppressive therapy with older RMD patients having BNT162b2 as a second vaccination may need additional booster vaccination.Reference[1]Furer V, Eviatar T, Freund T, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 Nov;81(11):1594-1602. doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-222550.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

PREDICTION OF MORTALITY USING CLUSTERS BASED ON CLINICAL AND LAB PARAMETERS: DATA FROM 2072 PATIENTS FROM INSPIRE COHORT

BackgroundLupus is a heterogenous diseases which results in significant premature mortality. Most studies have evaluated risk factors for lupus mortality using regression models which considers the phenotype in isolation. Identifying clusters of patients on the other hand may help overcome the limitations of such analyses.ObjectivesThe objectives of this study were to describe the causes of mortality and to analyze survival across clusters based on clinical phenotype and autoantibodies in patients of the Indian SLE Inception cohort for Research (INSPIRE)MethodsOut of all patients, enrolled in the INSPIRE database till March 3st 2022, those who had <10% missing variables in the clustering variables were included in the study. The cause of mortality and duration between the recruitment into the cohort and mortality was calculated. Agglomerative unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis was performed using 25 variables that define SLE phenotype in clinical practice. The number of clusters were fixed using the elbow and silhouette methods. Survival rates were examined using Cox proportional hazards models: unadjusted, adjusted for age at disease onset, socio-economic status, steroid pulse, CYC, MMF usage and cluster of the patients.ResultsIndian patients with lupus have significant early mortality and the majority of deaths occurs outside the hospital setting.Out of 2211 patients in the cohort, 2072 were included into the analysis. The median (IQR) age of the patients was 26 (20-33) years and 91.7% were females. There were 288 (13.1%) patients with juvenile onset lupus. The median (range) duration of follow up of the patients was 37 (6-42) months. There were 170 deaths, with only 77 deaths occurring in a health care setting. Death within 6 months of enrollment occured in in 80 (47.1%) patients. Majority (n=87) succumbed to disease activity, 23 to infections, 24 to coexisting disease activity and infection and 21 to other causes. Pneumonia was the leading cause of death (n=24). Pneumococcal infection led to death in 11 patients and SARS-COV2 infection in 7 patients. The hierarchical clustering resulted in 4 clusters and the characteristics of these clusters are represented in a heatmap (Figure-1A,B). The mean (95% confidence interval [95% CI] survival was 39.17 (38.45-39.90), 39.52 (38.71-40.34), 37.73 (36.77-38.70) and 35.80 (34.10-37.49) months (p<0.001) in clusters 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively with an HR (95% CI) of 2.34 (1.56, 3.49) for cluster 4 with cluster 1 as reference(Figure 1C). The adjusted model showed an HR (95%CI) for cluster 4 of 2.22 (1.48, 3.22) with an HR(95%CI) of 1.78 (1.29, 2.45) for low socioeconomic status as opposed to a high socioeconomic status (Table 1).ConclusionIndian patients with lupus have significant early mortality and the majority of deaths occurs outside the hospital setting. Disease activity as determined by the traditional activity measures may not be sufficient to understand the true magnitude of organ involvement resulting in mortality. Clinically relevant clusters can help clinicians identify those at high risk for mortality with greater accuracy.Table 1.Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models predicting mortalityUnivariateMultivariateVariablesHazard ratio (95% Confidence interval)P valueHazard ratio (95% Confidence interval)P valueCluster1Reference-Reference-20.87 (0.57, 1.34)0.5320.89 (0.57, 1.38)0.59831.22 (0.81, 1.84)0.3371.15 (0.76, 1.73)0.51342.34 (1.56, 3.49)<0.0012.22(1.48, 3.22)<0.001Socioeconomic statusLower1.78 (1.29, 2.45)<0.001Pulse steroidYes1.6 (0.99, 2.58)0.051MMFYes0.71 (0.48, 1.05)0.083CYCYes1.42 (0.99, 2.02)0.052Proliferative LNYes0.99 (0.62, 1.56)0.952Date of birth age0.99 (0.98, 1.01)0.657CYC- cyclophosphamide, MMF- Mycophenolate mofetilFigure 1.A. Agglomerative clustering dendrogram depicting the formation of four clusters. B.Heatmap depicting distribution of variables used in clustering C. Kaplan-Meier curve showing the survival function across the 4 clusters[Figure omitted. See PDF]REFERENCES:NIL.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone eclared.

CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS & OUTCOMES AMONG PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC AUTOIMMUNE RHEUMATIC DISEASES AND SARS-CoV-2 INFECTION: 2-YEAR DATA FROM A TERTIARY RHEUMATOLOGY CENTRE IN GREECE

BackgroundPatients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) under moderate/severe immunosuppression are considered a high-risk population to develop severe Covid-19 infection.ObjectivesThe aim of our study was to describe the clinical characteristics and the outcome of patients with ARD who contracted a Sars-Cov-2 infection.MethodsAmong patients with ARD being followed in our tertiary outpatient rheumatology clinic, we retrospectively identified those infected with SARS-CoV-2 between the beginning of the pandemic and August 2022. Patients' medical files were reviewed for demographics (age, gender and comorbidities) and disease-related characteristics, as well as coronavirus disease (COVID-19) characteristics, including vaccination status, treatment, and outcomes (covid-19 severity, hospitalization, death).ResultsA total of 209 cases of ARD patients with confirmed Covid-19 infection were recorded. Most of them were women (62.7%), with a mean age of 52.4± 13.8 years. The most prevalent ARDs were seronegative spondyloarthropathies (28.7%), systematic lupus erythematosus (21.5%), rheumatoid arthritis (16.5%), and systemic sclerosis (11.5%). More than half of the patients received corticosteroids (57.8%), while the most frequently used immunosuppressants were hydroxychloroquine (30.9%), TNF inhibitors (26.5%), mycophenolate mofetil (24.0%), methotrexate (19.1%) and rituximab (15.2%). One hundred and fifty-eight (76%) patients were either on remission or had mild disease activity. Most of the patients (131/209) had at least one comorbidity, more commonly arterial hypertension (48.5%) and pulmonary disease (45.2%). Most of the patients were vaccinated against Sars-Cov-2 (73.7%), either with two doses (38.0%), three doses (57.0%) or four doses (5.0%) of mRNA-based vaccines. The big majority of the patients (83.3%) were asymptomatic or had mild Covid-19 disease. About half of the patients (53.1%) reported to have received Covid-19 treatment. Thirty-two of them (15.3%) needed hospitalization, and five death cases were reported overall. Among the demographic characteristics, age (p<0.0001 for hospitalization) and comorbidities were associated with worse covid-19 outcomes. In particular, cardiovascular disease (OR 5.37, p=0.001 for covid-19 severity, OR 6.89, p=0.001 for hospitalization), pulmonary disease (OR 3.02, p=0.006 for hospitalization), and obesity (OR 3.46, p=0.044 for hospitalization) had the stronger associations. Non-vaccination status was also associated with a higher risk for hospitalization (OR 2.68, p=0.015). In relation to ARD-related factors, treatment with rituximab (OR 4.11, p=0.002 for hospitalization), systemic sclerosis diagnosis (OR 3.45, p=0.03 for Covid-19 severity) and myositis diagnosis (OR 4.91, p=0.033 for hospitalization) were associated with worse Covid-19 outcomes. On the other hand, spondyloarthropathies appear to be negatively associated with Covid-19 severity (OR=0.27, p=0.035).ConclusionAccording to our study, most ARD patients recovered uneventfully from Covid-19. However, there are several indications that we should be vigilant for patients who remain unvaccinated, are older, have a systemic sclerosis or myositis diagnosis, and/or receive intense immunosuppressive regiments such as rituximab.References[1]Papagoras C, Fragoulis GE, et al. Better outcomes of COVID-19 in vaccinated compared to unvaccinated patients with systemic rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Nov 10.[2]Strangfeld A, Schäfer M, et al. Factors associated with COVID-19-related death in people with rheumatic diseases: results from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance physician-reported registry. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jul;80(7):930-942.Table 1.N=209ARD Diagnosisn (%)Rheumatoid arthritis34 (16.3)Seronegative spondyloarthropathies60 (28.7)Systemic lupus erythematosus45 (21.5)Systemic sclerosis24 (11.5)Sjogren's syndrome15 (7.2)Vasculitis19 (9.1)Myositis9 (4.3)Other3 (1.4)Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

PRE-EXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS WITH TIXAGEVIMAB/CILGAVIMAB: SINGLE CENTRE EXPERIENCE IN A COHORT OF RHEUMATIC PATIENTS

BackgroundVaccination against SARS-CoV2 had a critical role in the fight against COVID19 pandemic.A weaker humoral response to COVID19 vaccine has been found in rheumatic patients treated with Rituximab (RTX) or Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)[1]. Despite the evidence that anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines can elicit a T-cell response [2], some data show that even the cellular immunity could be impaired in rheumatic patients [3] but COVID19 serology is the only parameter that is feasible to measure in daily practice.Tixagevimab+cilgavimab are two human-derived monoclonal antibodies administered parenterally and authorized by regulatory agencies in February 2022 for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) against COVID19 from different virus variants in fragile patients.ObjectivesTo demonstrate safety and effectiveness of tixagevimab+cilgavimab.MethodsPatients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases undergoing immunosuppressive treatment with RTX or MMF during the vaccination campaign were enrolled between April and June 2022. All patients must have anti-spike antibody levels below the protective threshold (defined by anti-spike IgG titre <250 BAU/ml) after receiving at least 2 vaccine doses.Patients were monitored with a questionnaire every month about COVID19 symptoms (including respiratory and gastrointestinal symptoms, anosmia and ageusia, skin rash and potential contact with COVID19+ subjects) and were checked for anti-spike and anti-nucleocapside antibodies titres every 2 months for a total of a 6 month follow-up. MMF dose was reduced at 1 g/die at the time of vaccine administration.ResultsFifteen patients were enrolled: 9 participants had a connective tissue disease (CTD;1 dermatomyositis, 3 anti-syntethase syndrome, 4 systemic sclerosis, 1 systemic lupus erythematosus) and 6 had vasculitis (all granulomatosis with polyangiitis). 12 of them received RTX in the preceding 12 months and 3 were taking MMF.About safety, the therapy was very well tolerated and only 4 patients (26%) reported a non-severe adverse event in the 2 weeks following drug administration (2 myalgia, 1 headache, 1 fatigue), none of them requiring hospitalization nor pharmacologic treatment.Regarding effectiveness, 3/15 patients contracted SARS-Cov2 infection (20%) with mild symptoms and no need for hospitalization nor oxygen therapy. Only 1 of them received an antiviral drug (nirmatrelvir+ritonavir). All infected patients had a CTD diagnosis. No significant correlation was observed between the type of rheumatic disease and the risk of infection or response to tixagevimab+cilgavimab.ConclusionNone of our patients developed severe adverse events after tixagevimab+cilgavimab administration and, among the 3 SARS-CoV2 infected patients, none required hospitalization nor oxygen therapy.We conclude that in our experience tixagevimab+cilgavimab is a safe and useful complementary immunization strategy to vaccination for COVID19 prophylaxis.These data will be implemented in a larger study, comprehending various immunocompromised patients from several departments.References[1] Furer et al., Ann Rheum Dis, 2021[2] Mangalakumari et al., Nat Rev Immunol, 2020[3] Picchianti-Diamanti et al., Front Immunol, 2021Charateristic of the cohortIdentificativeAgeDiagnosisRTX/MMFSARS-CoV2 InfectionHospitalizationAntiviral drugs180SScMMF-//270ASSDRTX+nono370ASSDRTX+noyes452GPARTX-//551GPARTX-//649SSc+SSjRTX-//768SScMMF-//847LESRTX-//964ASSDRTX-//1068GPARTX-//1123GPARTX-//1258DMRTX+nono1361SScMMF-//1475GPARTX-//1569GPARTX-//Figure 1.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ANTI-SARS-CoV-2 VACCINATION IN PEOPLE WITH RMDs: RESULTS FROM A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

BackgroundAs the third year of the pandemic begins, over 13 billion doses of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been administrated worldwide and growing evidence on their efficacy and safety in people with RMDs has accrued.ObjectivesTo update our previous systematic literature review (SLR)[1] on efficacy and safety of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs)MethodsA literature search according to the PICO framework was conducted on July 22, 2022 to identify references in seven databases published after June 1, 2021 (end date of previous SLR). Title and s were independently screened by 3 investigators (AA, AN and FK). Eligibility criteria were stricter in terms of requirement of the inclusion of control group or undertaking a multivariable analysis. However, for some outcomes (e.g., RMD flares), descriptive studies were also included due to the paucity of data. Data extraction and risk of bias (RoB) assessment were performed as in the previous SLR.ResultsOf 1583 references, 219 were included for full text assessment and 30 fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Recent studies confirmed that a full vaccination cycle was generally immunogenic, though the seroconversion rate and the anti-spike antibody (Ab) titre were lower in patients with RMDs compared to healthy controls. Vaccination was also able to induce neutralising antibodies (NAb) but the seroconversion rate and the neutralising activity were lower than in controls. Glucocorticoids, mycophenolate mofetil, rituximab and abatacept were negatively associated with Ab and NAb seroconversion. Two studies specifically investigating RTX-treated RMD patients identified an association between lower dose and longer period of time after the last RTX infusion before vaccination and higher likelihood of Ab seroconversion. The majority of breakthrough infections (B-INFs) were asymptomatic and, if symptomatic, mild to moderate. A higher number of vaccine doses was associated with a lower incidence and severity of B-INFs, although B-INF incidence rate was generally higher in the post-delta variant period. Higher disease activity was associated with higher likelihood of severe/critical B-INFs. Regarding safety, in general, patients with RMDs showed higher rates of mild AEs compared to the general population, however severe AEs were rare, if any. Disease flares have been observed in/reported by less than 10% of patients in the various cohorts and although often requiring treatment with glucocorticoids or change of the ongoing immunosuppressive therapy, hospitalization was generally not needed. Pre-vaccination colchicine prophylaxis seemed useful to prevent gout flares in the post-vaccination trimester.ConclusionOverall anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is immunogenic and safe in patients with RMDs. However, careful and individualised assessment of the ongoing therapy and disease activity when planning the vaccination schedule is necessary to minimise the risk of reduced immunogenicity, post-vaccination disease flares and breakthrough infections.Reference[1]Kroon FPB, Najm A, Alunno A, Schoones JW, Landewé RBM, Machado PM, Navarro Compán V. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022;81(3):422-432Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

Immune Responses to Mrna Vaccines against Sars-Cov2 in Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases

Background/Aims Patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRD) are commonly treated with immunosuppressors and are prone to infections. Recently introduced mRNA SARS-Cov2 vaccines have demonstrated extraordinary efficacy across all ages. Immunosuppressed patients were excluded from phase III trials with SARS-We aim to fully characterize B and T cell immune responses elicited by mRNA SARS-Cov2 vaccines in patients with rheumatic diseases under immunotherapies, and to identify which drugs reduce vaccine's immunogenicity. Methods Humoral, CD4 and CD8 immune responses were investigated in 147 SARS-Cov2-naive patients with selected rheumatic diseases under immunosuppression after a two-dose regimen of SARS-Cov2 mRNA vaccine. Responses were compared with age, gender, and diseasematched IMRD patients not receiving immunosuppressors and with healthy controls Results IMRD patients showed decreased seroconversion rates (63% vs 100%, p=0.04) and cellular immune responses (59% vs 100%, p=0.007). Patients on methotrexate achieved seroconversion in 62% of cases and cellular responses in 80% of cases. Abatacept deeply affected humoral and cellular responses. Rituximab (31% responders) and belimumab (50% responders) showed severely impaired humoral responses but cellular responses were often preserved. Antibody titers were reduced with mycophenolate and azathioprine but preserved with leflunomide. Conclusion IMRD patients exhibit impaired SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-immunogenicity, variably reduced with immunosuppressors. Among commonly used therapies, abatacept and B-cell depleting therapies show the most deleterious effects, while anticytokines preserved immunogenicity. The effects of cumulative methotrexate and glucocorticoid doses on immunogenicity should be considered. Humoral and cellular responses are weakly correlated, but CD4 and CD8 tightly correlate. Seroconversion alone might not reflect the vaccine's immunogenicity.

Challenges and Results of Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation for Adult Patients in Cuba

The Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital (HAH) in Havana is the only center performing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in adult patients in Cuba. Because transplants from unrelated donors are not possible due to political restrictions and economic embargo, in 2016 HAH and University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) started a collaboration to support the training of a physician, annual educational programs and exchange of guidelines and protocols to perform haploidentical transplants. The first haploidentical transplant was performed at HAH in 2016. Because of limited resources, disease risk stratification is based on morphologic assessment, as cytogenetic is tested on an irregular basis. Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were infused based on total nucleated cell count (TNC) due to lack of reagents for flow cytometry. Posttransplant chimerism and CMV monitoring cannot be performed. Transplant activity was stopped in 2020 due to high expenses allocated for COVID19 pandemic in Cuba. From 2016 to 2020, 16 haploidentical HSCT in 15 patients (9 males/ 6 females) were completed at HAH. The median age of patients was 34 years (range:21-54). Diagnoses included: acute leukemia, n=12, myelodysplastic syndrome, n=1, Hodgkin disease, n=1, and severe aplastic anemia, n=1. At the time of transplant, 11 patients were in morphologic remission and 5 had active disease. Conditioning regimens utilized were myeloablative (Flu/Bu) in 10 cases and at reduced intensity (Flu/Cy/ TBI200 +/- ATG) in 6 cases, and GVHD prophylaxis was standard PTCy on D3 and 4, CsA and mycophenolate. The donors were mother (n=10), father (n=1), child (1), or sibling (n=3) and the median age was 48 years (range: 26-68). All patients received fresh stem cells from PBSC(n=13) or bone marrow (n=3). Median cell dose infused was 5.5x108 TNC/kg (range: 2.2-8). All patients but 1 engrafted and median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 17 days (range:12-28) and 16 days (range:11-30), respectively. Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grade 2-3 occurred in 50% of patients and chronic GVHD in 2 out of 8 that were evaluable. Day 100 and 2-year overall survival rates were 73% and 40%, respectively. With a medium follow-up of 18.8 months (range: 0.3-64), 5 of 15 patients (30%) are alive and complete remission. Causes of death in the remaining 10 patients included relapse of original disease, n= 4;bacterial infection, n=2;brain hemorrhage, n=1;VOD, n=1;graft failure, n=1;and multi-organ failure, n=1. Despite significant difficulties, HAH implemented a haploidentical transplant program for adult patients in Cuba. Among future steps, improving access to molecular testing and using younger donors will be pursued to improve on the results. The partnership between HAH and UIC has been instrumental in building clinical and research capacity and continues to support HAH in its mission to provide care to patients in Cuba.(Figure Presented)Copyright © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

Dermatomyositis with Specific Autoantibodies Appearing after Sars-Cov-2 Infection or Mrna Vaccination: Hints at a Shared Pathogenetic Mechanism

Background. Environmental factors such as infections and vaccines are known to trigger dermatomyositis (DM), and during the recent SARS-CoV-2 pandemic this has become even clearer. SARS-CoV-2 infection may share features with anti-MDA5 DM, such as rapidly progressive lung involvement, cutaneous lesions and cytokine release syndrome. A few case reports of DM following SARSCoV-2 vaccination have been published, suggesting the onset of an aberrant immune response leading to DM with specific autoantibody signatures and severe organ impairment. Methods. Clinical and laboratory data of the 2 case reports were obtained from electronic clinical charts in Humanitas Research Hospital (Rozzano, Milan, Italy). Autoantibody analysis was performed by protein-immunoprecipitation for anti-MDA5 and immunoblot for anti-Ro52 and TIF1gamma antibodies as per protocol. Results. Case report 1 is a 71-year-old woman who developed fever, cough, and anosmia, which resolved spontaneously in two weeks, but did not undergo a nasopharyngeal swab, while her relatives were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection. When symptoms improved, she developed arthralgia and skin lesions on her face, chest, and hands for which she started topical treatment, with negative SARSCoV-2 nasopharyngeal swab and positive serum test for IgG against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. For the persistence of the skin rash and arthralgia, she was admitted to our Department in March 2021. Blood tests showed mild elevation of C reactive protein (2.1 mg/L -normal value NV<5), aspartate (84 UI/L) and alanine aminotransferase (133 UI/L -NV<35), ferritin (595 ng/ml -NV<306), troponin I (19 ng/L -NV<14), and BNP (251 pg/ml -NV<100) with normal complete blood cell count, creatine kinase, C3 and C4. IgG antibodies for SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were confirmed to be elevated (96 AU/ml -NV<15). Autoantibodies associated with connective tissue diseases were tested and only anti-MDA5 antibodies were positive at immunoprecipitation. A punch biopsy of a Gottron-like lesion on the left hand showed leukocytoclastic vasculitis. We observed reduced capillary density with neoangiogenesis and ectasic capillaries at the nailfold capillaroscopy. EKG and ecocardiography were normal, while cardiac magnetic resonance detected abnormalities in the parametric sequences, consistent with signs of previous myocarditis. A lung CT scan revealed pulmonary emphysema while respiratory function tests demonstrated reduced volumes (FVC 82%, FEV1 64%, inadequate compliance CO diffusion test). Based on the biochemical and clinical findings, a diagnosis of anti-MDA5-associated DM with skin and heart involvement was made and treatment with low-dose methylprednisolone (0.25 mg/kg daily) and azathioprine 100 mg was started, then switched to mycophenolate because not effective on skin lesions. Case report 2 is an 84-year-old woman with history of colon cancer (surgical treatment) and oral lichen treated with low doses steroids in the last 2 years. After the 2nd dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination, in March 2021 she developed skin rash with V-sign, Gottron's papules, periungueal ulcers, muscle weakness and fatigue, thus she performed a rheumatologic evaluation. Blood tests showed mild elevation of creatine kinase (484 UI/L, NV <167), CK-MB (9.6ng/ml, NV <3.4), BNP (215 pg/ml -NV<100) with normal values of complete blood cell count, C3 and C4. Anti-Ro52kDa and TIF1gamma were positive at immunoblot, thus we confirmed a diagnosis of DM. The clinical evaluation also showed active scleroderma pattern at nailfold capillaroscopy, normal echocardiography, bronchiectasia but not interstitial lung disease at lung CT, and normal respiratory function tests (FVC 99%, FEV1 99%, DLCO 63%, DLCO/VA 81%). A PET-CT scan was performed to exclude paraneoplastic DM, and treatment with steroids and mycophenolate was started. Conclusions. SARS-CoV-2 may induce mechanisms for escaping the innate immunity surveillance and causing autoimmune diseases, but more clinical and functional studies are needed to demonstrate this possible association.

A Case Report Of The Effects Of Chemotherapy On Post-heart-transplant Gene Expression Profiling

Introduction: Malignancies are a major complication of heart transplant (HT). Noninvasive surveillance after HT using gene expression (GEP) profiling and donor derived cell free DNA (dd-cfDNA) are noninferior to biopsy and are widely utilized. The interpretation of % dd-cfDNA, is not well understood in malignancies with a conceptual increase in the recipient fraction. The effect of chemotherapy on GEP in the setting of post-HT surveillance has not been described to the best of our knowledge. Hypothesis: Induction of chemotherapy will cause global transcriptional reduction in GEP. Method(s): GEP was performed with AlloMap (AM, CareDx), which evaluates expression levels of 11 mononuclear cell genes, involved in lymphocyte activation, T-cell priming, cell migration, hematopoietic proliferation, steroid sensitivity, and platelet activation. Scores range from 0-40, higher scores have a stronger correlation with rejection. At our center a total of 995 draws were analyzed from 2019-2022. In parallel dd-cfDNA, which informs about graft injury was analyzed using AlloSure (AS, CareDx). Case Events: A 71-year-old male HT recipient for nonischemic cardiomyopathy and no rejection history was diagnosed with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma at 16 months post-HT. Following diagnosis, mycophenolic acid was stopped, prednisone 5 mg was started, and tacrolimus trough goal was gradually lowered to 4-6 given infectious complications. Palliative chemotherapy with folinic acid, fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) was initiated at 18 months post-HT with planned dose reduction of oxaliplatin and holding of 5-FU bolus to reduce risk of myelosuppression given comorbidities. Oxaliplatin was stopped at 18 months post HT. Due to COVID he last received 5-FU at 33 months post-HT. Graft function remained stable and DSA negative. At 36 months post-HT, he developed a bowel obstruction without surgical options for interventions and expired shortly thereafter. Result(s): With initiation of prednisone and following chemotherapy there was a drastic decrease in AM scores (Fig. A). Steroid therapy led to an 18% decline in AM scores, the greatest decrease occurred with chemotherapy, with 67% decline from the mean when compared to all center patients (Fig B). Dd-cfDNA levels remained stable during the course aside from one early elevation. Conclusion(s): To the best of our knowledge this is the first published case on the effect of chemotherapy on GEP profiling in the setting of post-HT surveillance. This case advises caution when interpreting GEP in the setting of chemotherapy showing great reduction in GEP scores. While dd-cfDNA levels remained relatively stable after malignancy diagnosis and treatment initiation further studies will need to inform on the use of both GEP and dd-cfDNA in these patients.Copyright © 2022

Toxic epidermal necrolysis as a result of chlorthalidone and cyclophosphamide combination

Case report Introduction: Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), is an immune-mediated disease characterized by severe mucocutaneous symptoms and is the result of an inflammatory response that leads to keratinocyte necrosis and perivascular lymphocyte infiltration, mostly drug-related. Case report: A 35-year- old male, with a history of recently diagnosed systemic lupus under treatment with prednisone, hydroxychloroquine, mycophenolate and cotrimoxazole forte evolves with persistent proteinuria, it is decided to add losartan, chlorthalidone and atorvastatin. Nevertheless despite immunosuppression, proteinuria and skin involvement persisted, so mycophenolate was suspended and a bolus of cyclophosphamide 1 g was administered. Eight weeks after adjusting treatment, the patient went to the emergency department due to a confluent, pruritic, maculopapular rash with blistering lesions on the trunk, upper limbs, face, and oral mucosa, associated with fever over 38degreeC, that evolved during one week. On admission, the following was confirmed: confluent erythematous macular exanthem associated with multiple flaccid blisters on the chest, upper limbs and neck, Nikolsky's sign (+), keratoconjunctivitis and dryness on the lips. Admission tests included complete blood count with no leukocytosis or eosinophilia, ESR 29 mm/hr, C-RP 19.8 mg/L, no liver profile abnormalities, creatinine 0.8 mg/dl, and urine test with proteinuria 300 mg/dl. Negative infectious study for mycoplasma, herpes 6 virus, cytomegalovirus, Epstein barr virus, hepatitis A, B, C, E and SARS-COV2 virus. Due to severe mucosal skin involvement, TEN/SJS was suspected v/s (TEN)-like Lupus presentation, drugs used prior to admission (chlorthalidone, losartan, atorvastatin) were discontinued, and treatment was started with Hydrocortisone 100 mg every 8 hours IV, Immunoglobulin 2 g/kg daily IV for 4 days, plus skin and mucous membrane care. Patient had a favorable evolution, with resolution of skin and mucosal lesions and no signs of infection. Skin biopsy showed necrotic epidermis, necrotic basal keratinocytes, and sparse lymphocytic inflammatory infiltrate in the papillary dermis, consistent with erythema multiforme/toxic epidermal necrolysis. Conclusion(s): Extensive mucosal involvement is one of the cardinal signs of the presentation of SJS/ETN and given its severity, a high index of suspicion is important with the consequent suspension of suspected drugs and support management for a favorable evolution. In this case the suspected culprit drug was the combination of cyclophosphamide and chlorthalidone, due to reports of increased toxicity of cyclophosphamide in combination with diuretic drugs.

Acute exantematic pustulosis generalized by meropenem, differential diagnosis with COVID

Case report We present the case of a 63-year- old man with two consecutive admissions, due to COVID19 infection and subsequent bacterial superinfection. Three days after the second admission (04/28), and 43 days from the beginning of the infection an assessment by dermatology and allergology is then requested. The patient had generalized erythematous maculopapular rash in the trunk, back, groin and limbs. On the left side and back, pustular lesions not focused on follicles were also added, with a fever of 37.7degreeC. There were no oral and genital lesions. No psoriasis. The drugs used during the present and previous admissions were reviewed. Previous admission (04/04-22/ 20): Linezolid, ciprofloxacin, meropenem 04/13-22, piperacillin/tazobactam, hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, ceftriaxone. Upon discharge amoxicillin/acid clavulanic. Present admission (04/25) Cutaneous reaction 04/28. 04/25: meropenem, paracetamol, enoxaparin, insulin, omeprazole, venlafaxine. 04/26: Darbepoetin, furosemide, mycophenolate in single dose. 04/27: Linezolid, macrogol, Clopidogrel, Magnesium, Calcitriol. Medical records: DM type 2, liver transplantation due to HCV cirrhosis, HCV recurrence, uninodular hepatocarcinoma, advanced CKD, secondary hyperparathyroidism, multiple neurological antecedents. We performed a detailed study. We hypothesized with a pharmagological/ drug reaction with several drugs possibly involved and our main suspicion was an allergic reaction to beta-lactams. Biopsy: Subcorneal pustules, basal spongiosis and presence in the superficial dermis of edema and an inflammatory infiltrate with abundant neutrophils. No fungi. Findings compatible with clinical diagnosis of generalized acute exanthematic pustulosis (PEGA). Immunohistochemical study Covid19. (Jimenez Diaz Foundation) Finely granular positivity in endothelium and more coarse in sweaty epithelium. Neutrophilic superficial inflammatory component with presumably spure staining. ACe-2 (positive external control) is not detected. The patient presents a EuroSCAR score of 9, sum of the clinic and the pathological anatomy, and therefore defined diagnosis. Clinical diagnosis: PEGA secondary to meropenem. Conclusion(s): We present the case of a PEGA by meropenem, not very often described in the literature. We highlight the importance of differential diagnosis with viral infections. Skin tests, especially epicutaneous tests, are key to the diagnosis. (Figure Presented).

A Study of Long-Term Outcome of Mycophenolate Dose Modulation in Renal Allograft Recipients With SARS-CoV2 Infection During COVID-19 Pandemic

Introduction: A significant reduction of acute rejection rates was observed after using Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in renal transplant recipients (RTR). However, side-effects like hematological and gastrointestinal intolerance often occur when MMF is used in routine doses.MMF dose reduction is required during its side-effects or co-existing infection in RTR.The outcome of MMF dose modulation in RTR is not well established. COVID-19 pandemic has given an opportunity to study the effect of MMF dose modulation on graft function as large number of RTR who had Covid19 received MMF dose reduction or discontinuation. This study's objective was to determine whether MMF dose reduction or discontinuation was associated with the effect on allograft function after renal transplantation. We included all RTR who had an infection with SARS-CoV2 and received MMF dose reduction or discontinuation Methods: We prospectively collected data of Renal transplant recipients developing covid 19 infection during the first and second covid waves. Management including decision on admission, immunosuppression modulation, antibiotics were done based on clinician's discretion subject to logistics and the prevailing guidelines by the ISOT. All patients were followed up for minimum 15 months for graft dysfunction, biopsy rate, biopsy proven acute rejection ( BPAR). The effect of immunosuppression modulation - MMF cessation (Group A) Vs MMF reduction/no manipulation (Group B) and its bearing on the incidence of rejection and was compared. Additional factors such as follow - up sub therapeutic CNI levels, development of DSA ( when done ), steroid increment were studied regression model. Kaplan - meier survival curves for 24 months drawn. Result(s): Among 251 renal transplant patients with SARS-CoV2 infection, 38 patients died during Index admission. 45 patients has not completed for 15 months.168 patients completed 15 month follow - up. Among them, anti-metabolite were reduced in 115 ( 68.5%), stopped in 42 (25%), not manipulated in 5 ( 3%) and 6 patients were not on anti-metabolites and hence excluded from present analysis. Of the 162 patients, MMF had been stopped for 2 weeks or until presumed clinical recovery in 42 patients ( Group A) and the rest in 120 patients ( Group B). Mean age was 41.18 ( +/- 12.8) and 75.6 % had mild COVID. Median duration of follow-up was 18 months ( 14q1-22q3 months). Total Readmission rate was 66 ( 40.7%) (Group A 21( 50%) Vs Group B 45 ( 37.5 %). Graft Biopsy was done in 16% of patients. 9.3 % patients had acute rejection ( 11.9% Vs 8.3%, p 0.05). Among those who had rejection, ABMR was seen in 2, ACR in 3, CABMR in 5 and combined rejection in 1. Conclusion(s): MMF dose modulation to tackle an infectious episode may be associated with graft dysfunction and rejection on follow-up and close follow up is needed in any patient in whom MMF dose in manipulated No conflict of interestCopyright © 2023

COVID-19: From the Molecular Mechanisms to Treatment

The 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) causes severe pneumonia called COVID-19 and leads to severe acute respiratory syndrome with a high mortality rate. The SARS-CoV-2 virus in the human body leads to jumpstarting immune reactions and multi-organ inflammation, which has poorer outcomes in the presence of predisposing conditions, including hypertension, dyslipidemia, dysglycemia, abnormal adiposity, and even endothelial dysfunction via biomolecular mechanisms. In addition, leucopenia, hypoxemia, and high levels of both cytokines and chemokines in the acute phase of this disease, as well as some abnormalities in chest CT images, were reported in most patients. The spike protein in SARS-CoV-2, the primary cell surface protein, helps the virus anchor and enter the human host cells. Additionally, new mutations have mainly happened for spike protein, which has promoted the infection's transmissibility and severity, which may influence manufactured vaccines' efficacy. The exact mechanisms of the pathogenesis, besides molecular aspects of COVID-19 related to the disease stages, are not well known. The altered molecular functions in the case of immune responses, including T CD4+, CD8+, and NK cells, besides the overactivity in other components and outstanding factors in cytokines like interleukin-2, were involved in severe cases of SARS-CoV-2. Accordingly, it is highly needed to identify the SARS-CoV-2 bio-molecular characteristics to help identify the pathogenesis of COVID-19. This study aimed to investigate the bio-molecular aspects of SARS-CoV-2 infection, focusing on novel SARS-CoV-2 variants and their effects on vaccine efficacy.Copyright © 2022 NRITLD, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Iran.

Liver and COVID-19 - A Review and Clinical Approach

Liver enzyme abnormalities occur frequently in patients diagnosed with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It has been suggested that patients with severe acute liver injury are more likely to be admitted to intensive care, require intubation or renal replacement therapy and their mortality rate is higher than patients without severe acute liver injury. This review article explores the possible aetiologies of liver dysfunction seen in patients with COVID-19 and also the effect of COVID-19 on patients with pre-existing liver disease. Finally, we suggest clinical approaches to treating a patient with liver enzyme disturbance and COVID-19 and also caring for patients who require liver transplantation in the COVID-19 era.Copyright © 2022 Bentham Science Publishers.

A renal transplant patient with COVID-19 presented with acute cellular rejection

A 27-year-old man underwent a deceased kidney transplant. Three days after transplantation, COVID-19 was diagnosed for our patient. Immunosuppressants were reduced and a renal biopsy was conducted, which showed acute T cell-mediated rejection. We intened to share a case to help clinicians to understand the risks that kidney transplant recipients face.Copyright © 2023 The Author(s);Published by Society of Diabetic Nephropathy Prevention.

Isolated Colonic Histoplasmosis in Renal Transplant Recipient Post Covid-19 Infection

Introduction: Histoplasmosis is caused by the dimorphic fungus - Histoplasma capsulatum. The presentation of histoplasmosis is often disseminated, though primary intestinal involvement can rarely be seen in patients with cell mediated immune dysfunction like in patients with AIDS. We report a case of renal allograft recipient, who had history of COVID 19 infection and also underwent anti-rejection treatment for renal graft dysfunction, presented with chronic diarrhea and was diagnosed as a case of colonic histoplasmosis. Method(s): We report a case of 45 years old male who underwent renal transplant surgery one and a half year prior (February 2021) and was having stable graft function on tacrolimus, mycophenolate and steroid. He had history of fever and diarrhea in February 2022 and was diagnosed COVID-19 positive with RT-PCR, and was treated conservatively with intravenous dexamethasone and lowering of immunosuppressants. He had mild graft dysfunction in April 2022;renal graft biopsy had acute T-Cell mediated rejection (Banff Grade 1 B) and was treated with pulse steroids for 3 days. He had complaint of intermittent diarrhea, weight loss and intermittent fever since May 2022. He was evaluated and treated on outpatient basis with empirical oral antibiotics. He was admitted in June 2022 with complaint of high grade fever, loose stools leading to hypovolemic shock and renal dysfunction. He had marked thrombocytopenia and neutrophilic leukocytosis. He showed initial response to intravenous broad spectrum antibiotics and crystalloids, but intermittently symptoms of increased stool frequency and altered consistency were still persisting. Stool studies for ova, cyst, parasites and clostridium difficile were negative. Indian ink staining of stool sample had no evidence of Cryptococcosis. Serum PCR for cytomegalovirus was also negative. CT abdomen showed normal visualized bowel and other viscera. Upper GI endoscopy was unremarkable. Colonoscopy revealed multiple small ulcers with erythematous hue and clean base particularly in ceacum and along ascending colon. Multiple colonic biopsies were taken. Histopathology showed lymphoplasmacytic infilterate in the lamina propria. It also showed increased presence of foamy histiocytes, several of which also showed interacellular organism bearing a pseudocapsule. PAS stain also confirmed budding of these interacellular organisms which is consistent with Histoplasmosis. His HRCT chest revealed hyperinflated lungs, cylindrical bronchiectasis in left upper lobe. Urine for histoplasma antigenuria was negative. Result(s): He was treated with intravenous liposomal amphotericin B for initial two weeks followed by oral itraconazole. His symptoms responded remarkably to the treatment. In view of persisting thrombocytopenia and histoplasmosis his mycophenolate was stopped and tacrolimus was titrated as per trough levels Conclusion(s): Colonic histoplasmosis is associated with significant mortatlity and morbidity. Prolonged use of immunosuprresants, use of antirejection therapies (like high dose pulse methyl prednisolone and bortezomib) and even in some case reports COVID 19 infection have shown to increase the risk of histoplasmosis. Primary and isolated colonic histoplasmosis like in this case can be the atypical presentation which emphasizes the importance of maintaining a low threshold for consideration of histoplasmosis in renal allograft recipients. No conflict of interestCopyright © 2023